After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the boundary to a program for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article explores www.ascella-llc.com/asylum-procedure-advice how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to browse these systems and to pursue their legal right for security.

It also illustrates how these types of technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from getting at the programs of proper protection. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: while they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these types of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their instances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.